There is a growing body of research that supports the notion that genetics plays an important role in the development of physical skills. We do not have to be forced to work out just because we are physically gifted. There is a good reason why Olympic athletes are more successful than other athletes; they have a genetic makeup that can help them to excel at certain types of tasks.
For those who aren’t interested in a scientific explanation of genetics, let me quote a few of the scientific articles I’ve read that discuss the role genetics plays in fitness. I recommend The Biology of Genes (2001), which is an excellent source of information about the role genetics plays in fitness.
A good example of genetics determining an athlete’s success is the work of Harvard geneticist Michael Fischel. His hypothesis states that if we can breed a genetically superior athlete into the population, the population will have a greater chance of producing a superior athlete. Of course, it has been many years since the work of Fischel, but his hypothesis is still interesting. In our case, we are trying to produce a genetically superior soldier who will survive the battlefield.
For now, we have to settle for an athlete who is a bit more athletic than you are. That sounds reasonable, right? We are trying to produce a soldier who will be able to survive the battlefield. The advantage of having a soldier who is a bit more athletic than you is that you can train him so that he can get stronger. The disadvantage is that you have to train him. Which is why we are trying to reproduce an athlete who will survive the battlefield.
At last, we have a soldier who is a bit more athletic than you are. Because you need to train and train, he needs to train and train. The only way this can happen is if he has a genetic mutation or is born with a special gene that makes him stronger than you are. Even then, he would have to train for several lifetimes to get strong enough to survive the battlefield. Which is why we are trying to reproduce an athlete who will survive the battlefield.
It’s hard to imagine that the only thing that can’t be replicated is a human being at the end of the game. It’s like a zombie apocalypse. We’ll be able to replicate the way a zombie and a human would be able to.
The reason why this has not been done is the fact that we would need to give each of the players a unique body, unique skills, and unique personality. The problem is that it would be impractical to create a character from scratch every time. We would have to make sure the players maintain their unique traits and personality through the game. But then again, if we were to give someone their very own body, their very own abilities, the player would have to play the game forever.
To me this is a major problem with skill-related fitness. At least until we have something like the World of Warcraft where every character can be customized at will and then you can play them forever.
This also goes for skill-based gaming in general. I know that this is very unpopular, but I think it’s the only way to go. In any case, I definitely agree that it’s the only way to go.
The other thing that makes the game more challenging is the game’s time-looping, which is also a little more difficult. Even if the player has a couple of hours of time to try to win a game, they still get a little bit too much time to play. The difficulty here is that you can get close to a hundred different characters at once.